Dullness & tired skin
Why I put Reiki inside a facial, and what the evidence says
An honest account, including the parts where the research doesn’t support what people would like it to.

The short answer
Because ninety minutes of genuine rest is worth something on its own, and because clients ask for it. What the research supports is that people report feeling calmer afterwards. It doesn’t support any claim that Reiki changes skin, and I don’t make one.
In this article
What actually happens
In the treatments where it’s included, there’s a period near the end where the active work has stopped, a mask is on, and I rest my hands lightly on or just above the head, shoulders and décolletage. Usually ten to fifteen minutes. The room is quiet. Nothing is being applied and nothing is being asked of you.
There is no more to it than that. No equipment, no sound, nothing applied to the skin, and it isn’t billed separately. Most people fall asleep. I take that as the treatment working in the only sense I’m prepared to claim for it.
I trained in it years ago, when I was doing a great deal of hands-on work. I wanted to understand what my own hands were doing when I slowed down. What I came away with was mostly about pace and pressure. That has made me a better facialist, whatever anyone thinks of the framework it came in.
What the research shows
Biofield therapies means Reiki, therapeutic touch and their relatives. The honest summary is that the evidence for them is weak. Reviews consistently find small studies and inconsistent methods. And difficulty separating the effect of the practice from the effect of lying still in a quiet room with someone paying attention to you.
Where there are findings, they cluster around self-reported outcomes: people say they feel calmer, less anxious, and in some pain studies report lower pain scores. Those reports are real data about how people feel. They aren’t evidence of a mechanism, and the reviewers who report them say so.
I’d rather you booked this knowing the evidence is thin than booked it because I let you assume otherwise.
What the research does not show
There’s no good evidence that Reiki affects skin. Not barrier function, not inflammation, not healing, not pigmentation. If you’re ever told otherwise, it’s fair to ask to see the study.
There’s also no evidence for the energy model that’s usually offered as the explanation. I’m not going to defend a mechanism I can’t demonstrate. And I’m uncomfortable with how confidently that language gets used in my industry.
The obvious objection to all of this is that the calm is just the room, the quiet and the attention. That may well be true. I’ve never found it a damaging objection. The calm is the thing I’m offering, and it doesn’t need an exotic explanation to be worth fifteen minutes.
What people actually tell me
The most common report, by a distance, is that they slept unusually well that night. The second is that they hadn’t realised how much they were holding in the jaw and shoulders until someone put a hand there and they let it go.
A smaller number describe warmth, or a heaviness in the limbs. A few feel nothing at all and say so, cheerfully, and that’s fine. What almost nobody reports is anything about their skin. Which is consistent with everything above, and it’s why I don’t sell it as a skin treatment.
Why it is in there anyway
Because rest isn’t nothing. And the alternative to those fifteen minutes isn’t fifteen minutes of something better. It’s fifteen minutes of me talking about homecare while you’d rather be asleep.
Stress genuinely shows in skin. Raised cortisol is associated with slower wound healing and with increased oil production. And almost everyone who comes to me about dull, tired-looking skin is also sleeping badly. I can’t change that in an appointment. What I can do is give you an hour and a half where nobody needs anything from you. In twenty years I’ve found that a lot of people have nowhere else in their week where that happens.
So my claim is modest, and I won’t inflate it. This part of the treatment is aimed at rest. Rest is good for people. That’s as far as I’ll take it.
If you would rather I didn’t
Say so, at any point, including halfway through. It isn’t awkward, and I won’t ask why. Plenty of people book the same facial and would rather have the extra time spent on massage. That’s a perfectly good use of it.
The treatments where this is included are the ones described as restorative rather than corrective. If you’re coming to me about pigmentation, acne or texture, none of that work involves any of this. I keep the two apart deliberately.
Where I draw the line
This isn’t a treatment for anything. Not anxiety, not pain, not a diagnosed condition, and not a reason to delay seeing a doctor about something that needs one. If you’re unwell, please go and be seen. Come to me afterwards for the part that was only ever an hour of rest.
I also won’t read anything about you, tell you what I felt, or offer an interpretation of your energy. Some practitioners do. It invites people to take a stranger’s impressions seriously at a moment when they’re lying down with their eyes shut. I’d rather not be that stranger.
Sources
- Reiki - what the science says (opens in a new tab)US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
- Touch therapies for pain relief in adults (systematic review) (opens in a new tab)Cochrane Library